daamath.blogg.se

2+2=5 by Katie Roche
2+2=5 by Katie Roche










Others pointed out that 2.3 rounds down to 2, but 2.3+2.3 rounds up to 5, making it possible through a certain filter that 2+2=5. Many people pointed out that two animals can become three through reproduction (1+1=3, or 1+1=1, depending on your parameters), or that two machines could become three machines if you had some spare parts from each machine and a little elbow grease. Math Could Have Saved the Texas Power GridĬarr’s tweet received some replies displaying other examples of arithmetic’s real-world limitations.The Inmate Solving the World's Hardest Equations.

2+2=5 by Katie Roche

  • Math Can Help Cargo Ships See Into the Future.
  • ✅ Extra Credit: More Math Stories You'll Love Likewise, if you drilled a screw five full rotations (1,800 degrees) instead of four (1,440 degrees), the screw’s orientation remains the same, but in one case, it’s deeper inside the lumber. But a 360-degree angle has the same orientation as a 0-degree angle, so whether the angle measures 0 degrees or 360 degrees depends on context. Arithmetic works well in a textbook, but practically, it often runs into contextual questions that don’t account for parts of a whole, approximations, or more relevant vectors.įor example, if you’re adding whole degrees to an angle, eventually you’ll circle around to an angle that measures 360 degrees.

    2+2=5 by Katie Roche

    In his Twitter thread, Carr pointed out that counting numbers “are abstractions of real underlying things in the universe,” so we should be mindful of how those abstractions distort truth when introduced to real-world scenarios.

    2+2=5 by Katie Roche

    On July 30, he wrote, “I don’t know who needs to hear this, but if someone says 2+2=5, the correct response is, ‘What are your definitions and axioms?’ not a rant about the decline of Western civilization.” student at Harvard University, ignited a “Does 2+2 ever equal 5?” debate on Twitter. “I don’t know who needs to hear this, but if someone says 2+2=5, the correct response is, ‘What are your definitions and axioms?’ not a rant about the decline of Western civilization.”












    2+2=5 by Katie Roche